Thursday, April 20, 2017
Thursday, April 13, 2017
Last post of crapalachia
I think the moral of the story is that the author wanted to show readers how growing up in a small town with a big family was like. It seemed like Scott had a traditional way of how his family did things, whom all lived in the same exact town and neighborhood. There was no change between the families and how they did thing, except for a couple of members that moved away. What was also "traditional" and ironic were that most of his family members committed suicide. I don't why death was a broad topic in his writing and why most of them chose their death date. In my opinion, I found the book interesting because of how his style of writing was and how his family were towards things out of the norm.
Thursday, April 6, 2017
Type 3
The aspects I see in this writing so far is society and family. Nathan is treated differently than the rest of the family because of what he has. I think this is stereotypical because a family member that's disabled is treated differently than the rest of the family members. In general, society treats those who differently that is different. I feel like Ruby is treating him like this because he is has cerebral palsy. I also think Nathan dislikes the idea of this and wants to say something but fails to do so because of his condition. For example, he does try to explain the best of his ability that he is grown and doesn't need the extra treatment. "My god, she treats him like a child. He's an old man, but she'd still breast feed him if she could." (McClanahan, 20).
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)